Judge refuses to throw out sex assault case against Bill Cosby
NORRISTOWN, Pennsylvania — A judge on Wednesday refused to throw out the sex assault case against Bill Cosby, sweeping aside a former district attorney’s claim that he granted the comedian immunity from prosecution a decade ago.
With the decision, the case now moves to a preliminary hearing to see if prosecutors have enough evidence to prove Cosby assaulted the accuser at his Philadelphia-area home in 2004. They reopened the case last year based on Cosby’s newly released deposition in the accuser’s lawsuit and similar accusations raised by dozens of other women.
Cosby said in the deposition that he obtained quaaludes to give to women he wanted to have sex with and gave the accuser three pills at his home.
Cosby’s attorneys had argued that sexual assault charges against the comedian should be dropped because the state declined to prosecute the case more than a decade ago.
The defense started Wednesday’s hearing by calling lawyer John “Jack” P. Schmitt, part of a legal team that represented Cosby in 2005, to testify the district attorney at the time declared Cosby could not be prosecuted regarding allegations made by Andrea Constand.
The comedian’s attorneys asked a judge to dismiss the case in which Constand — one of a long line of Cosby accusers — accuses the TV star of assaulting her in his home in 2004.
Cosby was charged in the case in December, 11 years after the state initially declined to prosecute.
In addition to denying the allegations, Cosby argues he’s being improperly prosecuted based on testimony he gave during a civil suit — testimony his defense says was given only because the state closed the criminal case in 2005.
Bruce Castor, then the Montgomery County district attorney, did not file sexual assault charges against Cosby at that time, citing “insufficient credible and admissible evidence.”
But the district attorney’s office, now led by a new prosecutor, reopened the investigation based on “new evidence” that emerged from the unsealing of Cosby’s deposition in Constand’s civil suit.
Schmitt testified Wednesday it was clear to him that a 2005 news release from Castor — one announcing the prosecutor wouldn’t file charges against Cosby in connection with a woman’s allegations — was a written and irrevocable agreement that the comedian would never be prosecuted.
“We certainly wouldn’t have let him (Cosby) sit for a deposition” if he were still subject to criminal prosecution in the case, Schmitt said.
In addition, Schmitt said, Cosby’s lead attorney in the Constand case, Walter Phillips, “got assurances from Mr. Castor that this was an irrevocable decision that he had made.” Phillips has since died.
On cross-examination, Schmitt acknowledged Wednesday there was no other document besides the news release saying that no charges would be filed.
The prosecution said the defense hadn’t proved its claim.
“They (the defense) are saying there is an explicit agreement, and they are saying this (press release) document is the explicit agreement and in that document itself says it will revisit the decision,” a prosecutor argued Wednesday.
Later in the day, the prosecution called Constand’s lawyer, Dolores Troiani, who said she was not aware in 2005 of any decision or agreement that the state would never prosecute Cosby.
“My understanding of the press release was that he was not going to prosecute at this time, but if there was additional information, he would change his mind,” she testified.
She said she didn’t hear until September 2015 of any assertion that Cosby could not ever be prosecuted.
On Tuesday, Castor testified he made the decision not to prosecute Cosby. He said he did so in part because he didn’t believe the case was strong enough for a conviction.
Castor also said he thought the move might help Constand successfully sue the entertainer. He essentially conceded that the only reason Cosby testified in Constand’s subsequent 2005 civil suit — the testimony that new prosecutors are now using to charge him — was because he took any potential prosecution off the table.
When Castor declined to prosecute in 2005, he said, Cosby couldn’t claim Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination in the civil suit.
But Castor told Cosby’s attorneys Tuesday: “I’m not on your team. I want them (the prosecutors who’ve charged Cosby) to win.”
Other legal matters for Cosby
Also Tuesday in a separate case, a woman dropped a civil suit against the legendary comedian in a California court. Chloe Goins, now 24, had alleged Cosby sexually assaulted her at the Playboy Mansion in 2008.
She filed a court document allowing the suit to be dismissed.
Last month, a prosecutor in Los Angeles County declined to pursue a criminal case, saying evidence was insufficient to prove a crime was committed. Investigators learned Cosby was in New York the weekend of the event at which Goins accused Cosby of assaulting her.
Criminal case in Pennsylvania
Cosby was charged December 30 with aggravated indecent assault against Constand, who went to authorities in 2005.
According to an affidavit, Constand alleged Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted her in his Pennsylvania home in early 2004 after inviting her there to discuss her professional future.
Constand, a former director of operations for Temple University’s women’s basketball team, met Cosby in 2002 when, according to prosecution documents, she believed he sought her out to be a “mentor” and “sincere friend.”
Constand’s civil suit alleged battery, sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The suit was settled in 2006 with a confidential settlement agreement but not before a judge compelled Cosby to answer questions under oath.
That deposition was sealed for the last decade, but a federal judge unsealed parts of it last summer.
The district attorney’s office then cited “new evidence” from the deposition to reopen the case and brought the charges against Cosby.
That new evidence, according to prosecutors, centers on a question from Constand’s attorney Dolores Troiani and Cosby’s response during the sworn testimony:
Q. “When you got the Quaaludes, was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes for young women that you wanted to have sex with?”
Cosby later stated in the deposition he was only referring to one unnamed woman.
According to Cosby’s 2005 deposition testimony, he admitted sexual contact with Constand but said it was consensual.
Castor: I had bound Pennsylvania to my decision
On Tuesday, Castor said he warned his successor in 2015 — then-District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman — that the case had been “put to rest.”
Castor testified that when he heard speculation last year that Ferman might charge Cosby, he reminded her by email that he’d already committed the state not to prosecute the comedian.
“I knew I had bound the commonwealth as a representative of the sovereign,” Castor said.
He further explained to Cosby’s attorneys Tuesday why he didn’t pursue charges. He said:
• There were inconsistencies in Constand’s statements to police. “Within days, she changed the day when it happened from March back to January ’04.”
• Those inconsistencies “would affect her credibility at trial.”
• Constand contacted a civil lawyer before taking her allegations to police, which also hurt her credibility. Castor said that Cosby’s lawyer — Walter Phillips — told him that Constand and her mother were trying to get money from Cosby in exchange for not going to police.
• “Making Mr. Cosby pay money to Ms. Constand (through a civil suit) was the best I was going to be able to set the stage for.”
But Castor said he believed Constand.
“What I think and what is provable in a courtroom is two different things,” Castor said. “… What I think is that Andrea Constand was inappropriately touched by Mr. Cosby.”
Newly elected District Attorney Kevin Steele has argued a non-prosecution agreement never existed, saying in legal filings his office has no such documentation and can’t find anyone who does.
Cosby has yet to have his preliminary hearing and formal arraignment in the case.