State Supreme Court rules paring knives not protected by Second Amendment

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Washington state Supreme Court

SEATTLE (AP) — A divided Washington Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a Seattle law prohibiting people from carrying fixed-blade knives such as kitchen utensils for self-defense does not conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.

In a majority opinion written by Justice Charles Wiggins the court ruled that small paring knives are not an arm entitled to constitutional protection.

He calls the knife a utility tool, not a weapon and says that any common object may be used as a weapon but won’t trigger the constitutional protections afforded to “arms.”

The 5-4 ruling includes a strongly worded dissent, saying the Seattle law is too broad and is likely unconstitutional.

In the dissent, written by Justice Mary Fairhurst, argues the opposite conclusion that a fixed-blade knife is a bearable arm.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.