Supreme Court upholds the use of a controversial drug for lethal injections

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

A view of the death chamber from the witness room at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility shows an electric chair and gurney August 29, 2001 in Lucasville, Ohio.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld the use of a controversial drug for lethal injection in executions.

The ruling was 5-4 with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the majority, along with John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

“The prisoners failed to identify a known and available alternative method of execution that entails a lesser risk of pain, a requirement of all Eighth Amendment method-of- execution claims,” Alito wrote. “Second, the District Court did not o establish that Oklahoma’s use of a massive dose of midazolam in its execution protocol entails a substantial risk of severe pain.”

The dissent was written Justice Sonia Sotomayor. In a separate dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer raises the question of whether the the court should revisit the death penalty.

“I would ask for a full briefing on a more basic question: whether the death penalty violates the constitution.”

In an extremely rare occurrence, four separate justices read opinions from the bench.

Three death row inmates — Richard E. Glossip, John M. Grant and Benjamin R. Cole — brought the challenge arguing that the drug midazolam violates the 8th Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment because it fails to generate “a deep, coma like unconsciousness.”

Another plaintiff in the case, Charles F. Warner, was put to death , apparently without incident, before the Court agreed to take up the case.

Oklahoma uses an intravenous injection of midazolam to cause unconsciousness and follows it with a paralytic and then a third drug meant to serve as a heart-stopping agent.

But Robin C. Konrad, a lawyer for the prisoners, told the justices that midazolam “can never maintain the deep coma-like unconsciousness that is necessary to prevent a prisoner” from feeling the painful effects of the other two drugs in the protocol.

Six states – Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Virginia – have midazolam as an option in for use in lethal injections in their protocols.

The Supreme Court hearing revealed a deep tension on the part of some of the conservatives on the bench who expressed concern that the opponents to the death penalty are making it very difficult for the states to carry out executions using lethal doses of drugs.

“Let’s be honest about what’s going on here,” said Justice Samuel Alito. He suggested that executions could be carried out painlessly but those who oppose the death penalty are conducting “what amounts to a guerrilla war” consisting of efforts to make it impossible for the states to “obtain drugs that could be used to carry out capital punishment with little, if any pain.”

But the liberals, led by Justice Sonia Sotomayor questioned the use of the drug as well as the state’s case.

In 2008, the Supreme Court upheld Kentucky’s lethal injection protocol, but that case concerned a different combination of drugs that is no longer being used.

In court papers, Patrick Wyrick, the Solicitor General of Oklahoma said the state has improved its protocol since Lockett’s death and that the current protocol “does not present a substantial risk of severe pain and cannot be considered cruel.”

He described the crimes committed by the inmates including the fact that Glossip “hired his coworker to kill their employer by beating him to death with a baseball bat,” and that Benjamin Cole “murdered his nine-month old daughter by snapping her spine in half.”

In court, he told the justices that a lower court found that a 500 milligram dose of midazolam would “with near certainty, render these petitioners unconscious and unable to feel pain.”

The case comes when 70% of Americans say they don’t consider the death penalty itself to be “cruel and unusual punishment,” according to a recent CNN/ORC poll.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • tootietuttle

    let me guess…the liberals voted this down…why? Because they seem to love keeping pedophiles, rapists and murderers around. Was Ginsberg even awake when she voted?

  • SMP

    Can’t find the poll they claimed viewers could vote on : Should death penalty be banned in all 50 states? So I guess I’ll leave it in the comments then… NO!!!! Death penalty should NOT be banned! And sick of all the whining by those sentenced to the death penalty about lethal injection being “cruel & unusual”. What is cruel & unusual was the torment, horror, pain, fear, & suffering that their victims suffered in their last moments. Clearly anyone who would not give a rat’s ass about their victim has no concept of, nor regard for what “cruel & unusual” is. And it’s cruel & unusual for them to continually waste tax-payer dollars on someone that has proven with their actions that they have no respect for their victims, for society, and therefor have no respect for themselves or the woman who gave them life to begin with. Death penalty is NOT a sentence that is given lightly or excessively (with exception to the animals in shelters who are not guilty of anything other than human irresponsibility, ignorance, laziness, selfishness, etc. who suffer the gas chamber in some areas – now that is cruel & unusual).

  • BerniceALay

    my co-worker’s mother makes $63 an hour on the laptop . She has been laid off for 8 months but last month her payment was $16001 just working on the laptop for a few hours. browse this site>>>> Read More

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.