Museum removing historic rifles, citing concern over state’s new background check law

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

LYNDEN, Wash. — Throughout the World War II exhibit at the Lynden Pioneer Museum are weapons of war. Guns and rifles, the tools of the soldiers who often sacrificed their lives for their country.

Museum Director Troy Luginbill showed off an M-1 carbine rifle, and said, “A lot of guys would grab this because it was a lot easier to carry when you had to hike 10 miles in a day.”

While the exhibit  doesn’t end until May, many of the firearms on display will be gone by the start of December.

“In this situation, we can’t risk potential closure of the museum just so that we can make a political statement,” said Luginbill.

The museum’s board believes it is now violating the new state law requiring background checks on gun sales or transfers. Most of the weapons at the museum are on loan.

Luginbill said the museum can't afford all of those background checks and when the law takes effect Dec. 4, the plan is to take remove those guns from the display.

"I asked our lawyer what the worst case scenario was," said Luginbill. "He said if we're found in violation of the law and it goes to trial, we could lose our nonprofit status, and the museum is shut down."

The Attorney General's Office tells us it has not been asked for a formal opinion on the law and can’t speculate on different scenarios.

But according to Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility, the group behind the new law, the museum has no need to worry.

"It’s not about museums, it’s about closing pathways criminals use to get a hold of guns,” said Geoff Potter, the group's spokesman. "The museum should continue with it’s exhibit.”

But the Lynden museum is taking no chances, and will return these World War II guns.

Luginbill calls it a loss for the museum, history buffs, and the community.

"A replica just doesn’t have the same impact as real history has. And so museums are constantly wrestling with that. Do you want to see the actual Mona Lisa or do you just want to see a copy of the Mona Lisa?"

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • GoHawks82

    Unfortunately Geoff Potter, words have meaning. Especially when it comes to the law. Judges don’t enforce their interpretation of a law, they enforce the law as it was written. In this case, it is an extremely poorly written law.

  • Don

    Mr Potter, your poorly conceived and badly executed attempt to control everyone else is now law. You cannot grant exemption, you idiot, its law. So telling the museum to not take down their exhibit is particularly idiotic. You, Sir, are a Libtard genius.
    So now history can list you with other important gun control proponents–Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin. Except THEY all killed millions of people, and presumably, you haven’t yet, so your line in the books will be small….Same kind of control freaks, though.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.