No more Redskins? Patent office cancels trademarks

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Wild Card Playoffs – Seattle Seahawks v Washington Redskins

Redskins file photo from Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Patent Office has canceled trademarks belonging to the Redskins football team, saying they are offensive to Native Americans.

In a decision released Wednesday, the office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled that the “that these registrations must be canceled because they were disparaging to Native Americans.”

The Patent Office said it will continue to treat the trademark registrations as though they are valid while the team appeals the decision. The team has two months to do that, and the whole process could take years.

In the meantime, the Redskins can continue to use the logos.

But if the decision is upheld,it will be hard for the team to claim ownership of its brand. If it wants to go to court against a counterfeiter making T-shirts with the team’s logo, for instance, it will be harder to show that the organization owns the brand. The team will have to illustrate that they have always used the logos, rather than relying official trademark registrations.

The decision came in response to a suit brought by five Native Americans.

“We are extraordinarily gratified to have prevailed in this case,” Alfred W. Putnam, Jr., Chairman of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, which represented the five men and women, said in a statement.

The team has faced mounting pressure in recent years to ditch its name altogether, which is considered a slur against Native Americans.

The Patent Office also canceled the registrations in 1999, but a federal judge overturned that decision in 2003, saying there was no proof that the name was disparaging at the time of registration. Some of the patents date back to the 1960s.

In a brief statement put out by the team, its trademark attorney, recalled the previous decision.

“We’ve seen this story before,” the attorney, Bob Raskopf, said. “And just like last time, today’s ruling will have no effect at all on the team’s ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo.”

The Patent Office has occasionally denied trademark registrations deemed to be disparaging in the past, and even canceled existing ones. But today’s ruling against the Washington, D.C. team was unique given how old and visible the Redskins brand is, according to Tim Bukher, an intellectual property lawyer at Thompson Bukher LLP in New York City.

“It’s a 50-year-old asset of a major NFL team,” Bukher said. “I imagine it’s a pretty big hit resource-wise.”

The structure of the NFL, which distributes profits from licensing among the teams, could help mitigate any loss to the Redskins, Bukher said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Joe

    The Indians chose the name and created the picture. What you have here is white liberals imposing their garbage again.

    Typical Democrat, create waves and then ride the surfboard in order to create relevance and enjoy their cushy jobs with nothing positive to contribute.

    • Ted

      Like the republicans, always positive and trying to help the people, uh huh. On a side note a good new name would be the ‘Washington Red Whiners’, ………..GO HAWKS.!.!.!

  • Travis

    I am Native and although i only speak for myself, i do not find the Redskins name to be insensitive or disparaging. Its also frustrating to me that this debate has been argued for and fueled by caucasian people in their never ending quest for PC.
    What i do find disparaging is the patent office assuming the role of protectorate of political correctness. This sets a dangerous presidence, the govt making private business bend to their ideological will……

    • Joe Camel


      I too have native american ancestry, in fact my father is registered Cherokee Indian.
      Your so right about Caucasian folks and their never ending quest for PC.
      It would not surprise me if someone like Harry Reid or another in office put pressure on the Patent Office to reverse a patent that has been accepted since the inception of the team.

      Sad very sad, I am a proud of my redskin and its an honor to be referred to as such especially by Caucasians.

    • S_Hunter

      I'm only half Indian, but all my "cousins" I have talked to have no problem with the name. Like you say, it's the Caucasians trying to "rule all" in PC. I consider it just another step in the furtherance of the new world order. A concept ALL should be concerned with!

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.