Seattle issues city-wide curfew; Inslee activates National Guard

Would you favor DUI checkpoints in Washington?

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SEATTLE — Most of us would agree that driving under the influence is never a good idea.

Nothing good can ever come from it and the consequences can be devastating.

DUI CHECKPOINTThe Washington Impaired Driving Work Group was created by the Legislature last year after repeat drunken driver Mark Mullan drove through a crosswalk and struck and killed Dennis and Judy Schulte and injured their daughter-n-law and grandchild.

The 33-member work group released its report on Monday with 11 ideas to for reducing the problem of drunken driving.

More than 80 percent of the work group supports the controversial sobriety checkpoints

“The research shows sobriety checkpoints are the most effective means in reducing deaths and serious injury. It’s the only thing left in Washington state we have not enacted,” State Rep. Roger Goodman, R-Kirkland, said.

“Sobriety checkpoints, on the other hand, are not a cost-effective measure to do that.  They do have a deterrent effect but what we’ve found is that that deterrent effect is not as large as had previously been thought,” ACLU legislative director Shankar Naravan said.

Narayan says saturation patrols, where departments flood an area with officers and target drunken drivers, are a better solution and already being used in Washington.

“Saturation patrols have been effective and they’ve been effective at less cost.  They operate on the same principle of deterrence and they actually catch a broader range of behaviors that you would want to catch,” Narayan said.

Plus with checkpoints in Washington, there is the issue of constitutionality.

“This has already been looked at by our state Supreme Court and I think they were very clear that this was clearly a criminal search and you can’t just authorize a criminal search without individualized suspicion — an area warrant just won’t cover it,” Narayan said.

Lakewood Police Chief Bret Farrar has looked at the issue from all sides and takes what some might consider a surprising position.

“I don’t believe in it.  I don’t believe in treating everybody like they’re guilty.  That’s just not the way we do things, so in my own personal opinion I don’t believe in the checkpoints and I’m not supportive of them,” Farrar said.

Other ideas supported by the group include tougher penalties, longer prison sentences, bigger fines for repeat offenders and lowering the number of DUIs before a driver is charged with a felony.

There was even an idea to ban repeat offenders from buying alcohol but few members thought that a good idea or one that could be effectively enforced.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • Chris

    This amounts to a "show me your papers" mentality. Cops will find anything or just make something up to find probable cause, it's an abuse that has been going on forever with police. They don't deserve this kind of power to harass law abiding citizens just trying to get from one place to another.

  • Jenny

    I don’t drink at all. That doesn’t mean I want to be harassed on my way to work at 3 AM. I have nothing to hide, but I do like my privacy and my right to travel unmolested, thanks. The more power you give them, the more they take. Where does it stop? You’re going to let them violate your rights because you have nothing to hide. Next, they’ll stick their fingers up your butthole because they say they saw you with drugs that mysteriously disappeared when they stopped you at the checkpoint.

    I am not a big fan of cops, but I applaud Farrar’s stance on this terrible idea.

    • Rob

      And to Rep. Roger Goodman, you will never be getting my vote, and I will make sure everyone I know sees where you stand on the errosion of civil liberties.

  • Rob

    Whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? Whatever happened to not being accosted if you’re not commuting a crime and there is no reasonable suspici

    It is illegal to detain someone if there is no reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. However, by their very nature check points violate this. See this video as an example:

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.