Weekend closures, lane restrictions impact SR 99, I-5 and I-90

Report: More than 100 batteries failed in 787 tests

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

787 ZA001 air to airSEATTLE– More than 100 of Boeing’s troubled lithium-ion batteries had to be returned to their Japanese manufacturer, according to a report released by the Seattle Times.

Citing unnamed sources of someone “inside the 787 program with direct knowledge,” the Times reported that as many as 150 batteries were sent back to Japan before the Federal Aviation Administration grounded Boeing’s troubled plane.

Officials with Boeing declined to mention the overall number of batteries sent back.

According to the Times, the prevalence of the battery issues reflects problems with the plane’s electrical system. The New York Times reported that All Nippon Airways (ANA) replaced 10 batteries on its fleet of 17 Dreamliners prior to the 787’s grounding. Five of the 10 batteries were low in charge, the primary problem of the returned batteries.

However, low-voltage problems were not related to a battery that caught fire in Boston and a smoking battery grounding a plane in Japan.

Lithium-ion batteries can be “dangerously volatile” if undercharged, the Seattle Times reported.

The batteries are manufactured by GS Yuasa in Japan and sent to Boeing through the system supplier, Thales of France. GS Yuasa supplies lithium-ion batteries for such things as the International Space Station and railway vehicles.

Fixing the problem could be costly and time-consuming, the Times reported.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • batman

    There has been plenty of incorrect information released by the media concerning the failure of the Yuasa Lithium-ion batteries. Some of the incorrect information may have been leaked by Boeing officials that were hoping to blame the battery manufacturer for supplying a defective product. It is obvious to anyone familiar with the characteristics of these batteries that the failures are due to a electrical system design problem in the aircraft. The batteries are intended to be cycled between 20% and 80% of their charge capacity, and within a specific duty-cycle rating. Both charging and discharging will result in heating of the battery. Thermal runaway and battery damage will occur if the duty-cycle of charging and discharging is greater than design specifications of the battery.

  • dale

    Thank you. Was wondering about the parameters. Am I wrong in thinking the lithium-ion batteries are the same technology used in the electric cars?