Donate to the Q13 FOX Cares and Les Schwab Holiday Toy Drive

Oklahoma Republican Party under fire after controversial Facebook post

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.


OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma Republican Party is under fire after a controversial Facebook post.

In the post, the Oklahoma GOP compared providing food stamp benefits for Americans in need to feeding animals at national parks.

“The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing this year the greatest amount of free Meals and Food Stamps ever, to 46 million people,” the Oklahoma Republican Party said on Facebook. “Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us ‘Please Do Not Feed the Animals.’ Their stated reason for the policy is because ‘The animals will grow
dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.’ Thus ends today’s lesson in irony #OKGOP.”

The Facebook status was posted Monday, but started gaining traction on Tuesday.

The post has received more than 1,400 comments and 1,600 shares.

Screen shot of the now deleted Facebook post from the OKGOP

Screen shot of the now deleted Facebook post from the OKGOP

Most of the commenters thought the status went too far.

“Are we really comparing people living in poverty to animals?” Laura asked.

“The true lesson in irony is that the same party demanding that the Ten Commandments monument should remain on the Capitol is neglecting the very premise of Christianity. What happened to Matthew 25:35? “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in.” Or is it just more convenient to only pay attention to the verses against homosexuality…?” Courtney said.

Even other conservatives thought the post was in poor taste.

“As a Conservative I will say plainly that this is in awful taste. It’s a disgrace and the comparison made in this post is beyond offensive. It takes away from legitimate discussions regarding Welfare. It’s counterproductive,” Alexander said.

While most of the comments on the controversial post were overwhelmingly negative, there were others who agreed with the message.

“Bravo!! Great truth!! Some need help in some cases but to continue to LIVE EXPECTING handouts is not right!!” Pat said.

Oklahomans receiving assistance average $118 for individuals, $257 for families, per month. In April of this year, 591,425 Oklahomans in 268,588 households received food stamps, a decrease of 1.2% from April of last year.

In Oklahoma, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides a maximum benefit of $649 a month for a four-member household whose monthly net income does not exceed $1,988, or $23,856 per year.

The Oklahoma Department of Human Services was appalled by the post.

“Shame on you for comparing people in poverty with disabilities to animals! That was an appalling and uninformed comment. Obviously you did not bother to know the majority of the 604,000 people receiving food benefits in Oklahoma are people who are aging, people with disabilities (including disabled veterans) and the working poor who are raising children.  The able-bodied adults who do not have children can only receive food benefits for three months if they are unemployed or must work at least 20 hours a week to receive help beyond that point.  Last month, only 13,000 or 2.1% of the total recipients were in this category.  Food benefits are a very small amount and are not intended to be a person’s entire food budget, thus the name “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.” In fact, the average SNAP benefit is $4.27 per person per day or $1.42 per meal. The people who need this meager benefit are dependent upon it in order to keep themselves and their children from starving.  Is that the kind of dependency you are suggesting we discourage?” the Oklahoma Department of Human Services said on the controversial post.

The House Democratic Leader Scott Inman released a statement rebuking the Facebook post.

“Certainly we should do all we can to reduce the number of our citizens – children, seniors, working mothers and others – who receive food stamps,” Inman stated. “But to compare them to animals is insulting, degrading, and not at all in the spirit of Christ. I hope that my friends and colleagues in the OK GOP will denounce posts like this one and instead focus on solutions to the challenges facing our poor and needy.”

After much backlash, the Oklahoma Republican Party deleted the post and released a statement apologizing for the post, saying it was not intended to be offensive.

We want to hear from you, let us know what you thought about the controversial post on our Facebook or Twitter pages.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • something or nothing

    They made a valid point. I know many people because they have public assistant they refuse to work. Or refuse to take more hours because they will lose their free money or public. Not everyone on public assistance is like that but it is what it is. Even now people refuse extra hours at work so they dont lose their public housing due to the 15$ and hour. there will always be a line of if you need it ir just want it and that line is very thin.

  • AnnaKDennis

    …my co-worker’s step-aunt makes $84 an hour on the computer ..// She has been fired for nine months but last month her pay was $16688 just working on the computer for a few hours. Visit Website>>> Read More

  • DB

    Leave it to the idiot public to miss the obvious point, which is the irony that it’s abhorrent to the state to get animals used to not fending for themselves, and therefore they will lose the ability to do so, yet it’s perfectly okay to undermine the will and ability of a large group of the populace to fend for themselves.