Background check advocates take step toward getting initiative on ballot

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

gunOLYMPIA — Backers of an initiative that would require criminal and public safety background checks  for anyone trying to buy or inherit a gun cleared the first round of hurdles Wednesday, bringing the measure one step closer to a popular vote.

According to the secretary of state, backers of I-594 submitted an estimated 250,000 signatures in 15,000 petitions to the secretary of state’s office Wednesday. They hope to have the issue brought before the state legislature in 2014. If lawmakers don’t pass the measure, and enough valid voter signatures are submitted, it will be on the 2014 ballot.

The group, led by Jewish Federation shooting victim Cheryl Stumbo, planned to submit at least 325,000 signatures by the Jan. 3 deadline, all but guaranteeing the issue would be taken up by the 2014 legislature.

If passed, the initiative would enforce stricter regulation on gun buys and background checks.

The issue of background checks again rose to national prominence in late 2012, when a shooter killed more than 25 children and adults at an elementary school in Connecticut.

According to the Seattle Times, opponents of the measure are also collecting signatures for a separate initiative that would restrict the state from adopting stricter background check rules.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • adam

    the 2nd amendment is clear… the right to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed" Stop trying to pass unconstitutional laws please…