Russia agrees to back U.N. Security Council resolution on Syria

By Paul Richter and Shashank Bengali, Los Angeles Times

UNITED NATIONS — Russia agreed Thursday to back a United Nations Security Council resolution that demands Syria relinquish its chemical weapons, but stops short of threatening President Bashar Assad with military force if he doesn’t comply.

The Obama administration hailed it as a “breakthrough” despite its failure after nearly two weeks to persuade Russia, Assad’s strongest international backer, to support a resolution that would invoke Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter and could have authorized the use of force or other action if Syria didn’t disarm.

If Assad doesn’t comply, the decision on how to punish him would go back to the Security Council, where Russia holds a veto. Moscow has steadfastly opposed military intervention in Syria and has questioned a U.N. investigation that determined chemical weapons were used in an attack on rebel-held suburbs of Damascus on Aug. 21, which the U.S. says killed more than 1,400 people. The U.S. and its allies say the U.N. report proves that the Assad government was behind the attack, but Russia has remain unconvinced.

Without the threat of force behind the deal, it’s unclear whether  Assad will live up to his promise to give up his stockpile of illicit chemical warfare agents, one of the world’s largest. U.S. officials say Syria possesses more than 1,000 tons of blister and nerve agents, including mustard, sarin and VX gases.

Supporters of the resolution say it will help advocates of strong penalties build support for action within the Security Council — or outside it — if Assad fails to comply with the disarmament deal.

U.S. officials say Assad’s forces have fired rockets or other munitions filled with chemical agents at least a dozen times against insurgents battling to overthrow him. The Aug. 21 attack, which involved sarin nerve gas, was the largest by far.

The State Department said the text that the five permanent Security Council members agreed to Thursday is “strong, binding and enforceable” and unites international opinion against the use of chemical weapons.

“This is historic and unprecedented because it puts oversight of the Assad regime’s compliance under international control,” according to a State Department statement attributed to an unidentified senior official.

“Equally as important, it makes absolutely clear that failure of the Assad regime to comply will have consequences,” the statement added.

U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power tweeted that the resolution legally obligates Syria to give up its chemical weapons and “creates a new norm” against the use of poison gas.

Security Council members — permanent members United States, Britain, France, Russia and China, and 10 rotating members — were due to discuss the draft resolution in a closed session late Thursday. A vote could occur by the weekend.

Diplomats said the draft resolution roughly mirrors the framework agreement reached by Secretary of State John F. Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Geneva on Sept. 14.

The deal required Assad to reveal all his chemical weapons and production facilities to international inspectors, to allow inspectors into Syria by the end of November, and to agree to have the entire toxic arsenal seized or destroyed by mid-2014.

Assad met the first benchmark, submitting what officials have called a “serious” initial disclosure of his weapons program last Friday to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

The international organization monitors compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention, an international treaty that Assad signed this month and that bans the production, storage or use of poison gas.

Details of how the weapons would be impounded or destroyed have yet to be finalized. U.S. officials said the OPCW, which is based in The Hague, soon would determine those specifics in a plan that would closely match the terms set out in the Security Council resolution.

“These two texts are a matched set,” a senior U.S. official said this week on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York. “They have to be congruent. They have to be mutually supporting.”

A Western diplomat, who requested anonymity to describe the draft resolution, said it calls chemical weapons use a threat to international peace and security, condemns the Aug. 21 attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, commits to endorsing the OPCW disarmament plan and demands accountability if Assad reneges.

But it doesn’t specify how Assad would be held accountable and includes no reference to the International Criminal Court, the world war crimes court, the official said.

john kerry

Photo courtesy of publicintegrity.org

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Related Stories