‘Living small’ in Seattle: Apodment developers exploiting loopholes?

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SEATTLE — Micro-housing is a new, controversial concept that is spouting up in the region, especially Seattle. These are apartment-like buildings, except the units aren’t much more than 100 square feet with shared kitchens.

apodments4“There’s a lot of people that want to live in these units,” said Roger Valdez, a density proponent who writes for the website Smart Growth Seattle. “Many people are saying, hey, I don’t need all that extra room. I want to pay a lower price for less square footage, and keep the other money for something else.”

About a dozen of these projects have been built in Seattle, over the objections of many nearby residents, and several more are planned as the demand for them continues.

A typical “apodment” rents on a month-to-month lease for between $500-$600, utilities and Wi-Fi included.

“It’s not for everyone,” said Valdez. “But for the segment of the population out there that is moving to Seattle (and) looking for a place to live that’s affordable, that will be flexible for them, those people are choosing micro-housing in great numbers.”

But opponents worry that just because there is demand for them doesn’t mean they are a good idea.

“If people are hungry, OK, they’ll eat dog food, OK. That’s not the question,” said community activist Bill Bradburd.  He argues that neighborhoods are getting overwhelmed by these projects, which can house up to 60 people on a relatively small lot.

One big worry is that they will simply become short-term housing.

“I think that’s really the concern of people in the neighborhood. Are the people going to be here, are they going to be part of my community, or are they just somebody passing through?” Bradburd asked.

Apodment resident Scott Lyman, who’s a student with a part-time jobs, says making the choice to live small made sense.

“It was affordable,” he said. “Rather than have to move in with a lot of people that I’ve never met before and have no clue who they are, I can actually afford to live on my own, over here.”

Seattle City Councilman Tom Rasmussen says developers are exploiting a loophole in the zone code that needs to be fixed.

“The city was caught napping when the developers started to create these, and now the city’s trying to catch up,” he said.  “There’s very little design review, there’s no environmental review and all of those things that normally apply to an apartment building that would house 50 or 60 people don’t apply to the micro-apartments.”

Rasmussen is working on legislation now that would bring micro-housing permitting in line with other multifamily buildings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • Paul

    Plain and simple- DPD is helping the developers attain these loopholes through unreasonable judgments and turning a blind eye in favor of developers. When the DPD allows a 6 story plus a penthouse (7 stories and 73 living occupants and no parking) to be built up against single family housing without review, SEPA and Environmental Impact Studies, and under the guise of a 4 story 14 room structure as per the permit listing, it is either deceptive or incompetent. Take look for yourself:

    "Land Use Application to allow a four story 14 room congregate residence in an environmentally critical area. No onsite parking is provided."

    Either way the developer builds at the community's expense.

    Thank you Tom for hearing legitimate neighborhood issues and being a real elected public servant.

  • Jimmy

    The city needs to put an end to these dormitory-style buildings. A lot of the new development in Seattle hasn't provided enough parking for the increase of new residents. Those town homes with tiny garages just add more cars on the streets and now these chicken coops are even worse.

  • Paul

    The city just had the developer correct the first SEPA checklist submitted by the developer because we complained. DPD had been letting this project proceed with the old SEPA list that was full of errors and actually was for a building by the Ballard Fred Meyer. I have a copy someone wants to read it.

    This apodment is in West Seattle on Southwest Avalon Way. This new SEPA list stilll understates the parking, traffic and transit impacts, says pretty much that there are none. The number of units for that apodment is now listed at 102 with no parking and up against sing family housing.

    Really Ms.Sugimura? The DPD is making sure that these are built safely, according to codes and appropriately? How does that happen when DPD is rubber stamping these projects without properly evaluating them? Ms. Sugimura, it is your signature that is approving these projects and they are full of errors. This is the 4th out of 4 projects in the last year, full of errors and SMC and approved design guideline violations thjat sits right up against our neighborhood. Public review is needed to keep the DPD honest as it works for developers instead of acting as hired and appointed public servants.