Officer charged for allegedly hitting cuffed man who struck wife, also a cop

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Seattle police officer Chris Hairston

SEATTLE — A Seattle police officer was charged Wednesday with misdemeanor assault for allegedly hitting a handcuffed man being detained by other officers.

City Attorney Pete Holmes charged police officer Chris Hairston in connection with a Sept. 24, 2012, incident in which Hairston allegedly assaulted a handcuffed man who was being detained by police for assaulting Hairston’s wife, also a police officer.

According to the City Attorney’s Office news release, Katherine Hairston and a fellow officer had responded to a report of a person passed out near Seattle Central Community College. The officers contacted several people who were drinking alcohol, and one of them assaulted Hairston. She was treated at a hospital for a head injury and scrapes to her hands and knees.

After officers had placed Katherine Hairston’s 23-year-old assailant in handcuffs, her husband, Chris Hairston, a K-9 officer on duty elsewhere at the time, arrived on the scene, walked up to the suspect and, it is alleged, intentionally assaulted him, the City Attorney’s Office said.

The penalty for a misdemeanor assault conviction is up to 364 days in jail and a fine of up to $5,000.

Katherine Hairston’s assailant, John M. Ross, was charged with third-degree assault by the King County Prosecutor’s Office. He pleaded guilty to fourth-degree assault.

In another officer-involved case that received substantial media attention, Holmes on Wednesday declined to charge police officer Clayton Powell with misdemeanor assault, relying on the opinion of an outside use-of-force expert hired to do an independent analysis of the Aug. 2, 2012, incident.

“On that day, Powell and other officers responded to an ‘aggravated assault’ radio call at 3713 S. Othello St. As the police were investigating, roughly 25 young men gathered and began yelling taunts at the officers. Some allegedly yelled racial slurs at Powell. The tactical situation became precarious as the angry group surrounded the officers. Powell and one of the young men became separated from the crowd and got involved in a verbal exchange. At one point, the officer removed his police badge and hat.

“During the verbal back-and-forth, the young man spat on Powell’s face; in turn, the officer pushed him in the chest.  Another officer immediately took the young man custody. During the handcuffing process, Powell grabbed the young man’s hair and pulled it back. The young man was taken to the South Precinct and placed in a holding cell. While he was in the holding cell, Powell was captured on video taunting him and, at one point, acting as if he were going to strike him. The young man was not referred to CAO for charging,” the office said.

The City’s use-of-force expert, Gregory Yacoubian, a lawyer in Los Angeles and former LAPD lieutenant, determined it was not substantially likely that a jury would convict Powell of misdemeanor assault, based on his review of the video and facts of the case.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • ralph Verrone

    the handcuffed suspect and the police officer who assaulted him ,, should just be given the same prison sentence,,

  • Todd Bainbridge

    The cop will get a suspended sentence or probation if even convicted. Maybe pay a $100 fine.
    I'm not saying their job is easy, but when you sign up for that job, you put yourself forth as one of our finest and you accept that there will be tough situations and that you will need to remember your responsibility to uphold the law above any personal emotions.

    Had the assault occurred when the detainee was not handcuffed, I could possibly see it differently. Hitting anyone (even a suspect who, mind you, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law) while they are restrained is reprehensible and deserves the same criminal assault charges as a non-badge-wearer would garner, and corresponding disciplinary consequences as evidenced by one's failure to complete their job successfully and without errors.