Nation’s most restrictive abortion measures signed into law in N. Dakota

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

redriverBISMARCK, N.D. — North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple has signed into law the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation, including one that bans abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, which can come as soon as six weeks after conception.

A second bill signed by the Republican governor bans abortions solely for the purpose of gender selection and genetic abnormalities. And another requires that any physician who performs abortions must have staff privileges at a nearby hospital.

The three new laws — and a previously approved resolution calling for a November referendum on a constitutional amendment that is designed to protect life at any stage of development — places the state at the forefront of efforts to limit abortion rights.

Supporters of abortion rights have said they will fight the referendum and will seek to have the laws blocked in the courts.

The laws test the current standards established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1973 Roe vs. Wade and other cases. In general, the Supreme Court has held that a woman has a constitutionally-protected right to an abortion until the fetus is viable outside of the womb, generally at between 22 and 24 weeks.

In a statement, Dalrymple acknowledged that the state’s new laws, especially the heartbeat requirement, will face legal challenges.

“Although the likelihood of this measure surviving a court challenge remains in question, this bill is nevertheless a legitimate attempt by a state legislature to discover the boundaries of Roe vs. Wade,” the governor stated. “Because the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed state restrictions on the performing of abortions and because the Supreme Court has never considered this precise restriction … the constitutionality of this measure is an open question.”

The governor also noted that the law requiring hospital privileges could be challenged in the courts.

“The added requirement that the hospital privileges must include allowing abortions to take place in their facility greatly increases the chances that this measure will face a court challenge,” he stated. “Nevertheless, it is a legitimate and new question for the courts regarding a precise restriction on doctors who perform abortions.”

The measures would go into effect Aug. 1.

North Dakota is the first state to ban abortions based on genetic defects, but at least three other states ban abortion based on gender selection.

Other states have lowered the effective date beyond which abortions are no longer legal, though North Dakota’s would be the most stringent. Arkansas passed a 12-week ban earlier this month that prohibits most abortions when a fetal heartbeat can be detected using an abdominal ultrasound.

— Los Angeles Times


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • WJJJ

    Amen and good for them…may other states follow suit…maybe someday the murdering in the name of convenience will stop.

    • Urm0m

      Finally some one is using the wonders of science to prove that a fetus is a human and deserves the same protections we all enjoy. A heartbeat can be detected as early as 21 days post-conception.

      And to say that Roe v. Wade restricts abortions after viability at 22-24 weeks is extremely ignorant. A case in point is a woman who died last month after a late term 33 week abortion. And to have an abortion that late in the game is the same as giving birth but without the protection of a hospital (few abortionist have hospital admitting privileges) so the argument for “the life of the mother” is invalid.

  • re:anonymous

    I was supposed to be aborted but the doctor in a car accident the day he was to perform an abortion on my mother. I grew up rejected by my mothers love was in foster care by the treatment I had received by my biological parents. I am now in my 30’s and I believe in life at conception. It never mattered to me about how hard my life was. What mattered to me was how I lived my life despite my hurdles. In the end,I say I choose life and who is another person to choose what would be best for my life before I had a chance to speak.