Washington to lead multi-state lawsuit against Trump administration over family separations

Class-action lawsuit strives to expand coverage for kids with autism

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Parents want what’s best for their kids and for families of children with autism, providing them the necessary therapy can be difficult and expensive.

Companies traditionally haven’t covered autism therapy the same way they do other chronic medical conditions, despite the state’s Mental Health Parity Act requiring them to provide such coverage.

Last spring, several families banded together to file class action lawsuits against insurance companies like Group Health, Regence and Primera, asking them to get rid of annual treatment limits and not deny coverage after a child turns seven years old.

“When you’re looking at a year of therapy and you have 12 visits, that goes pretty quickly,” Jennifer O’Neal, whose son Zachary is autistic, said. “Your benefits are maxed out in the first three months.”

After that, most families with autistic kids have to pay for treatment out of pocket.

“That’s financially devastating,” Kristen Griffin said. “People are losing their homes and choosing between food and services for their kids because these services do help, but they’re not cheap.”

The Griffin family is suing Primera for denying coverage to their son — the family received a stack of bills telling them they owed the company $24,000.

“These parents pay for premiums just like everybody else, and the fact their child has a developmental condition instead of a medical condition shouldn’t mean they get any less coverage,” attorney Ele Hamburger said.

As a judge reviews the cases, Group Health announced it will temporarily suspend coverage limits and require that patients show improvement within two months to continue treatment.

Attorneys expect a judge to rule on these class action suits by February 2013, but said the state insurance commissioner could get involved and require insurance companies to make these changes by the end of the year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • cclngthr

    Often it is not even covered.

    I have Cerebral Palsy, and insurance companies do not fully cover that either. When I taught full time (I taught kids with autism and other disorders both in sped and reg classrooms) the district insurance was going to charge me $2,100 a month in premiums with a $5,000 deductable.

  • Mary Howell

    so with 1 in 88 kids with Autism, and the insurance companies not paying, do you think we will get on the band wagon to prevent autism? Note the change point in the last ten years pointing to vaccine and
    the delivery medium… ( fetal stem cells?) not the vaccine itselves. Why can't we get save vaccines using safe delivery medium… see http://soundchoice.org/autism/ solution is Adult Stem cells, not fetal stem cells. – prayers and blessing to us all. – M

    • cclngthr

      I don't think autism can be prevented because not much is known of what causes it. Children with the disorder are born with it, it appears early on. The increase of incidence of autism primarily has to do with the diagnosis and identifying of certain behaviors within the DSM IV criteria.